It’s amazing to me how many people are willing to sacrifice others for a false sense of security, to make them feel safe. It’s even more amazing when it comes from someone in your own family who has had the time to know your life, your experience, your health issues, your story, and yet they still want you to eat the cookie that could potentially kill you, just to make them feel safe.
The cookie in question would be a cookie that you have a known allergy to, as well as a prior history of eating that cookie and having your health destroyed. Knowing there are many others like myself who have also eaten that cookie and had the same reaction and struggling just to live life with the myriad of conditions and health issues spurned by those damn cookies.
Those cookies destroyed my health. When trying to find out why, no one seemed to care. What makes my genes different? What made people like me respond in the way in which we did? There’s an obvious genetic component involved but no one wants to study the issue. Why? I can only assume, since the manufactures have no real liability, they have no real incentive to research the issue. Studies costs money. There are many many willing participants who’d love to be involved to see what makes us different so we can enjoy a safe cookie like everyone else but we’re the minority and I’ve since learned, we really don’t matter. No one wants to spend the money and they likely don’t want to admit that their cookies can cause that kind of harm in the first place.
For two decades, I’ve brought up these questions. I’ve asked medical personnel. I’ve been silenced, gaslit, and told correlation doesn’t equal causation… Let’s think about that last statement. Correlation doesn’t equal causation. Wow, can that apply to many things but in my cookie case, it almost always seems to apply. We know that only a small number of people have their injuries reported in the first place. This is fact. Even drug reactions are rarely reported, I’ve witnessed that many time. If these reactions are not being reported as they’re supposed to, then we don’t have a legitimate accurate database where we can see how many people had the exact same reaction and how that reaction grew over time. We miss the obvious, that many have had that same response and correlation is looking much more common than otherwise reported. Seeing those numbers would then, ethically prompt more research into the issue. Just like a black box warning applied to meds that were later deemed unsafe for a subset of the population. But cookie injury reporting is one of the least of all reported types of injuries. Again, is it the lack of liability? Why wouldn’t we want a safe alternative for those who can’t digest it?
In becoming injured by those infamous cookies, health declining and disabled, I have become the vulnerable. The vulnerable who can no longer eat of those cookies. It would be harmful to my health and since we don’t know what the mechanism is behind it, we have to assume it’s the entire cookie. Had they researched the issue, maybe we could have pinpointed something in it or understood the way in which my body processes those cookies but again, no one cared enough to investigate the issue. In addition, current cookies now contain an ingredient that I do have a known allergy to. And sadly, I was told by my own family member that I should eat it anyway. Aren’t they the ones who are supposed to eat the cookies to protect me? The ones who can’t? That’s the line we’ve been fed for generations yet that somehow suddenly doesn’t apply? Or is my family member just being toxic and selfish willing to sacrifice another for the impression of saving himself? That’s what catering to the ‘greater good’ does to people. It’s always at the expense of another and I just so found out, I am the other they’re willing to sacrifice. Doesn’t look good on this side of the fence.